<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 364 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of fraudulently availed Cenvat credit and associated penalties in a case involving clandestine clearance of MS ingots. The penalties imposed on individuals were reduced due to excessive harshness compared to penalties on the company. The appeal of the company was rejected, while appeals of individuals were partly allowed, emphasizing compliance with Cenvat credit rules and consequences of fraudulent activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 364 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of fraudulently availed Cenvat credit and associated penalties in a case involving clandestine clearance of MS ingots. The penalties imposed on individuals were reduced due to excessive harshness compared to penalties on the company. The appeal of the company was rejected, while appeals of individuals were partly allowed, emphasizing compliance with Cenvat credit rules and consequences of fraudulent activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>