<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 403 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309731</link>
    <description>Service rules requiring a departmental examination for promotion were construed as a coordinated scheme, so late passage could not automatically forfeit seniority where the Government had failed to hold the examination in the relevant years. Executive circulars could supplement but not override statutory rules framed under Article 309, and the statutory power of relaxation remained available for genuine hardship. The text also notes that the later proviso recognised promotion where the examination was not held in a year, subject to passing at the earliest opportunity. On that basis, restoration of seniority for affected officers was treated as consistent with the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 17:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 403 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309731</link>
      <description>Service rules requiring a departmental examination for promotion were construed as a coordinated scheme, so late passage could not automatically forfeit seniority where the Government had failed to hold the examination in the relevant years. Executive circulars could supplement but not override statutory rules framed under Article 309, and the statutory power of relaxation remained available for genuine hardship. The text also notes that the later proviso recognised promotion where the examination was not held in a year, subject to passing at the earliest opportunity. On that basis, restoration of seniority for affected officers was treated as consistent with the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>