<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 719 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals. The foreman&#039;s dividend was treated as income, disallowance under Rule 8D r.w.s. 14A was upheld, disallowed bad debts were deleted, and royalty payment was treated as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal relied on precedent in confirming these decisions, resulting in the dismissal of both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 15:10:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 719 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals. The foreman&#039;s dividend was treated as income, disallowance under Rule 8D r.w.s. 14A was upheld, disallowed bad debts were deleted, and royalty payment was treated as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal relied on precedent in confirming these decisions, resulting in the dismissal of both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>