<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 833 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 61,39,71,805/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, finding that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of purchases and the identity of suppliers. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that the assessee did not qualify for the exceptions under Rule 6DD(f) and dismissed the appeal, affirming the disallowance as justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 833 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 61,39,71,805/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, finding that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of purchases and the identity of suppliers. The Tribunal agreed with the lower authorities that the assessee did not qualify for the exceptions under Rule 6DD(f) and dismissed the appeal, affirming the disallowance as justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>