<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 823 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443201</link>
    <description>An auditor of a listed public-interest entity must obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, exercise professional skepticism, document the basis of opinion, and report material misstatements and disclosure failures. The article states that the auditors failed to report non-recognition of interest cost on NPAs, inadequate disclosure of income-tax exposure, and deficiencies in going concern and impairment assessment. It further says the audit file did not support proper risk assessment for trade receivables, engagement quality review, planning, or documentation. These cumulative lapses were treated as professional misconduct under the NFRA disciplinary framework, resulting in penalties and debarment of the audit firm and the engagement partner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 823 - NATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443201</link>
      <description>An auditor of a listed public-interest entity must obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, exercise professional skepticism, document the basis of opinion, and report material misstatements and disclosure failures. The article states that the auditors failed to report non-recognition of interest cost on NPAs, inadequate disclosure of income-tax exposure, and deficiencies in going concern and impairment assessment. It further says the audit file did not support proper risk assessment for trade receivables, engagement quality review, planning, or documentation. These cumulative lapses were treated as professional misconduct under the NFRA disciplinary framework, resulting in penalties and debarment of the audit firm and the engagement partner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>