<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 407 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to assess Tecalemit (India) Ltd. as the successor to the non-resident company. The assessment on the Indian company was deemed null and void, as the non-resident company, the predecessor, was available for assessment. The Tribunal emphasized that section 170(2) could only be invoked when the predecessor could not be found, which was not the case here. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the assessment on Tecalemit (India) Ltd. was without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 407 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to assess Tecalemit (India) Ltd. as the successor to the non-resident company. The assessment on the Indian company was deemed null and void, as the non-resident company, the predecessor, was available for assessment. The Tribunal emphasized that section 170(2) could only be invoked when the predecessor could not be found, which was not the case here. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the assessment on Tecalemit (India) Ltd. was without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>