<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 314 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34011</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the principle of unjust enrichment applied in the case, preventing the refund of excess duty paid by M/s. Vanithamani Chemicals Ltd. under the SSI benefit scheme. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to established legal principles and interpretations in matters of excise duty refunds. The Tribunal vacated the impugned order and restored the original authority&#039;s decision, denying the refund to M/s. Vanithamani Chemicals Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 314 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34011</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the principle of unjust enrichment applied in the case, preventing the refund of excess duty paid by M/s. Vanithamani Chemicals Ltd. under the SSI benefit scheme. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to established legal principles and interpretations in matters of excise duty refunds. The Tribunal vacated the impugned order and restored the original authority&#039;s decision, denying the refund to M/s. Vanithamani Chemicals Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>