<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 779 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443157</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 1,90,000/- imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) due to the invalid assumption of jurisdiction and the inadequacy of the Show Cause Notice. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, and the other grounds of appeal were left open and not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 779 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443157</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty of Rs. 1,90,000/- imposed by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) due to the invalid assumption of jurisdiction and the inadequacy of the Show Cause Notice. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, and the other grounds of appeal were left open and not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>