<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 199 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI-LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34009</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi-LB, addressed issues concerning the limitation period for appeal, the absence of a critical Agreement copy, and procedural norms for Larger Bench cases. The Tribunal decided to refer substantive issues to a Larger Bench, excluding limitation matters, which the Division Bench would address if needed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper documentation distribution, particularly involving the Bar Association, to ensure transparency and adherence to procedural norms in significant cases. The Company Secretary&#039;s request for additional preparation time on merits was unopposed, highlighting the Tribunal&#039;s commitment to fair process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 199 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI-LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34009</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi-LB, addressed issues concerning the limitation period for appeal, the absence of a critical Agreement copy, and procedural norms for Larger Bench cases. The Tribunal decided to refer substantive issues to a Larger Bench, excluding limitation matters, which the Division Bench would address if needed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper documentation distribution, particularly involving the Bar Association, to ensure transparency and adherence to procedural norms in significant cases. The Company Secretary&#039;s request for additional preparation time on merits was unopposed, highlighting the Tribunal&#039;s commitment to fair process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>