<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 404 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34008</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the reference case petition, ruling that no question of law arose requiring the Tribunal to draw up a statement of facts and refer the matter for resolution. The Court emphasized that the change in authorities&#039; views on the shortage of goods in subsequent years did not justify formulating a legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 404 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34008</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the reference case petition, ruling that no question of law arose requiring the Tribunal to draw up a statement of facts and refer the matter for resolution. The Court emphasized that the change in authorities&#039; views on the shortage of goods in subsequent years did not justify formulating a legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>