<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1876 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309703</link>
    <description>Suspension under service rules may be justified by detention or a pending criminal investigation, but it cannot be continued indefinitely without initiating disciplinary proceedings. The Court held that prolonged suspension, when the employer takes no bona fide steps to start departmental action, is inconsistent with fair procedure and Article 21. Grant of bail did not end the criminal case, but it removed any basis for keeping the employee out of service forever, especially where the employer already had sufficient material to proceed. Continued suspension was therefore arbitrary, the denial of reinstatement was unsustainable, and relief to resume duty was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2023 05:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1876 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309703</link>
      <description>Suspension under service rules may be justified by detention or a pending criminal investigation, but it cannot be continued indefinitely without initiating disciplinary proceedings. The Court held that prolonged suspension, when the employer takes no bona fide steps to start departmental action, is inconsistent with fair procedure and Article 21. Grant of bail did not end the criminal case, but it removed any basis for keeping the employee out of service forever, especially where the employer already had sufficient material to proceed. Continued suspension was therefore arbitrary, the denial of reinstatement was unsustainable, and relief to resume duty was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>