<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 23 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34006</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to refunds resulting from final assessments and cases where confiscation orders are set aside. However, the court ruled that the doctrine does not extend to refunds of fines and penalties, as they are not considered duties or taxes. The Appellants were granted the refund of the remaining redemption fine amount along with interest at a rate of 13% per annum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 23 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34006</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment to refunds resulting from final assessments and cases where confiscation orders are set aside. However, the court ruled that the doctrine does not extend to refunds of fines and penalties, as they are not considered duties or taxes. The Appellants were granted the refund of the remaining redemption fine amount along with interest at a rate of 13% per annum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>