<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1280 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309696</link>
    <description>Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended, was construed harmoniously with Sections 200, 203 and 204 to mean that a Magistrate need not in every case postpone issuance of process merely because the accused resides outside territorial jurisdiction. The duty to hold an inquiry or direct investigation arises only if the Magistrate chooses to defer process under Section 202(1). Where a complaint under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act discloses a prima facie case on the materials before the Magistrate, direct issuance of process under Section 204 is not invalidated by the absence of a separate Section 202 inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 12:03:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1280 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309696</link>
      <description>Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended, was construed harmoniously with Sections 200, 203 and 204 to mean that a Magistrate need not in every case postpone issuance of process merely because the accused resides outside territorial jurisdiction. The duty to hold an inquiry or direct investigation arises only if the Magistrate chooses to defer process under Section 202(1). Where a complaint under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act discloses a prima facie case on the materials before the Magistrate, direct issuance of process under Section 204 is not invalidated by the absence of a separate Section 202 inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>