<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1573 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309693</link>
    <description>Amended Section 202 CrPC requires inquiry before process is issued against accused persons residing beyond the Magistrate&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, but non-compliance does not automatically invalidate the proceeding. The breach is a procedural safeguard, not a jurisdictional defect, and its effect must be tested on prejudice or failure of justice under Section 465. Where the complaint and Section 200 statements already disclose sufficient material, a further inquiry may be unnecessary. Examination under Section 200 of a witness not named in the complaint is not illegal, because the complainant may produce supporting witnesses and no prejudice arises merely from non-mention in the complaint petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1573 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309693</link>
      <description>Amended Section 202 CrPC requires inquiry before process is issued against accused persons residing beyond the Magistrate&#039;s territorial jurisdiction, but non-compliance does not automatically invalidate the proceeding. The breach is a procedural safeguard, not a jurisdictional defect, and its effect must be tested on prejudice or failure of justice under Section 465. Where the complaint and Section 200 statements already disclose sufficient material, a further inquiry may be unnecessary. Examination under Section 200 of a witness not named in the complaint is not illegal, because the complainant may produce supporting witnesses and no prejudice arises merely from non-mention in the complaint petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>