<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 726 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order allowing withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 12A. The decision was based on the approval of withdrawal in the Committee of Creditors meeting with 92% voting in favor, meeting the requirements of the I&amp;amp;B Code. The Tribunal found that legal procedures and principles of natural justice were followed, rejecting claims of non-adherence. The validity of claims and voting rights in the CoC were upheld, and the Tribunal affirmed its limited jurisdiction to interfere with CoC decisions, ultimately dismissing the appeal and closing the related stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 726 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order allowing withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 12A. The decision was based on the approval of withdrawal in the Committee of Creditors meeting with 92% voting in favor, meeting the requirements of the I&amp;amp;B Code. The Tribunal found that legal procedures and principles of natural justice were followed, rejecting claims of non-adherence. The validity of claims and voting rights in the CoC were upheld, and the Tribunal affirmed its limited jurisdiction to interfere with CoC decisions, ultimately dismissing the appeal and closing the related stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>