https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443134 Faceless assessment challenges based on disputed additions to returned income were held unsuitable for writ jurisdiction where statutory appellate remedy remained available. The assessment followed notices under Section 142(1) and a draft assessment notice, but the taxpayer did not submit a proper reply to the show-cause notice cum draft assessment order. The Court held that such disputed factual issues should be pursued in appeal, and the taxpayer may also seek stay of recovery under the applicable provisions, with recovery kept in abeyance pending that application. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Sep 2023 08:48:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443134 Faceless assessment challenges based on disputed additions to returned income were held unsuitable for writ jurisdiction where statutory appellate remedy remained available. The assessment followed notices under Section 142(1) and a draft assessment notice, but the taxpayer did not submit a proper reply to the show-cause notice cum draft assessment order. The Court held that such disputed factual issues should be pursued in appeal, and the taxpayer may also seek stay of recovery under the applicable provisions, with recovery kept in abeyance pending that application. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 08 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443134