https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443109 Anti-dumping duty could not be recovered for the gap period between expiry of a provisional anti-dumping notification and issuance of the final notification, because the statutory scheme did not allow the final levy to operate retrospectively so as to extend the provisional duty beyond its permitted duration. The final notification could not validate collection for the interregnum after the provisional duty had ceased, and the demand for that period was therefore unsustainable. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443109 Anti-dumping duty could not be recovered for the gap period between expiry of a provisional anti-dumping notification and issuance of the final notification, because the statutory scheme did not allow the final levy to operate retrospectively so as to extend the provisional duty beyond its permitted duration. The final notification could not validate collection for the interregnum after the provisional duty had ceased, and the demand for that period was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443109