<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 311 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34000</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that repacking a product from bulk to consumer form does not constitute manufacturing as there is no creation of a new product, only a change in the mode of application. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, stating that the repacking activity did not amount to manufacturing. The appeal was dismissed without costs, and the respondent was ordered a refund of duty paid under protest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 311 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34000</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that repacking a product from bulk to consumer form does not constitute manufacturing as there is no creation of a new product, only a change in the mode of application. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, stating that the repacking activity did not amount to manufacturing. The appeal was dismissed without costs, and the respondent was ordered a refund of duty paid under protest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>