<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 732 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order due to the lack of proper notice before depriving the appellant of property rights. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness over the source of funds used for property purchase, highlighting the necessity of issuing notice before confiscation and the importance of establishing clear ownership of confiscated property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2023 08:46:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 732 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order due to the lack of proper notice before depriving the appellant of property rights. The judgment emphasized procedural fairness over the source of funds used for property purchase, highlighting the necessity of issuing notice before confiscation and the importance of establishing clear ownership of confiscated property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>