<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 738 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order deleting the penalty on its merits, dismissing all eight appeals by the Revenue. The decision emphasized that when the basis for penalty imposition ceases to exist, the penalty itself cannot be sustained. The judgment was pronounced on July 13th, 2023, in accordance with Rule 34 of ITAT Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 738 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order deleting the penalty on its merits, dismissing all eight appeals by the Revenue. The decision emphasized that when the basis for penalty imposition ceases to exist, the penalty itself cannot be sustained. The judgment was pronounced on July 13th, 2023, in accordance with Rule 34 of ITAT Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>