<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 171 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning Service Tax demand, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant for services provided under the category of &#039;Clearing and Forwarding Agent&#039; services. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s relationship with ONGC was on a principal to principal basis, and the services rendered did not align with C &amp;amp; F Agent services. Relying on a previous order in favor of the appellant, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting consequential relief due to the absence of a stay on the operation of the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision despite the department&#039;s appeal to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 171 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning Service Tax demand, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant for services provided under the category of &#039;Clearing and Forwarding Agent&#039; services. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s relationship with ONGC was on a principal to principal basis, and the services rendered did not align with C &amp;amp; F Agent services. Relying on a previous order in favor of the appellant, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting consequential relief due to the absence of a stay on the operation of the Tribunal&#039;s previous decision despite the department&#039;s appeal to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>