<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 906 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309667</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court entertained Special Leave Petitions directly from two accused, former Chief Ministers of Bihar, challenging bail refusal in the Bihar Fodder Scam case. Despite objections on not approaching the High Court first, the Court considered the interconnected cases and granted interim bail for six months to the accused, subject to stringent conditions. Concerns of tampering with evidence were addressed through specified conditions, including restrictions on influencing witnesses and refraining from public comments. The Court found further detention unnecessary, disposing of the appeals by granting bail based on the case merits and pre-trial detention period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 16:29:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 906 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309667</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court entertained Special Leave Petitions directly from two accused, former Chief Ministers of Bihar, challenging bail refusal in the Bihar Fodder Scam case. Despite objections on not approaching the High Court first, the Court considered the interconnected cases and granted interim bail for six months to the accused, subject to stringent conditions. Concerns of tampering with evidence were addressed through specified conditions, including restrictions on influencing witnesses and refraining from public comments. The Court found further detention unnecessary, disposing of the appeals by granting bail based on the case merits and pre-trial detention period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>