<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 695 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443073</link>
    <description>The Court held that proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act could not be initiated once a dispute was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The Court found that the issue was identical to that resolved under the Scheme, rendering the notice under Section 263 invalid. Consequently, the notice dated 13th January 2022 was quashed, and the petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 695 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443073</link>
      <description>The Court held that proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act could not be initiated once a dispute was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The Court found that the issue was identical to that resolved under the Scheme, rendering the notice under Section 263 invalid. Consequently, the notice dated 13th January 2022 was quashed, and the petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>