<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 689 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443067</link>
    <description>In ITA No. 30/Viz/2023 (AY: 2017-18), the Appellate Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed under section 270A on the assessee-firm for underreported income to 50% of the tax payable, as the purchases and sales returns were found to be properly accounted for. The Tribunal also ruled that penalties based on expenditure estimation are not sustainable, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. In ITA No. 31/Viz/2023 (AY: 2017-18), the Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalty under section 271B imposed for non-submission of the tax audit report, as the report was prepared for the correct year but uploaded incorrectly. The penalties were deemed unjustified and were deleted in both cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 08:54:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 689 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443067</link>
      <description>In ITA No. 30/Viz/2023 (AY: 2017-18), the Appellate Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed under section 270A on the assessee-firm for underreported income to 50% of the tax payable, as the purchases and sales returns were found to be properly accounted for. The Tribunal also ruled that penalties based on expenditure estimation are not sustainable, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. In ITA No. 31/Viz/2023 (AY: 2017-18), the Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalty under section 271B imposed for non-submission of the tax audit report, as the report was prepared for the correct year but uploaded incorrectly. The penalties were deemed unjustified and were deleted in both cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>