<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 671 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443049</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271B is not sustainable where the assessee&#039;s turnover remains below the threshold that triggers the tax audit obligation under section 44AB, because the foundational duty to obtain and furnish a tax audit report does not arise. On the facts, the turnover was found to be below the prescribed limit, so failure to furnish an audit report could not attract penalty. Non-compliance before the first appellate authority did not affect that merits-based conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 15:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 671 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443049</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271B is not sustainable where the assessee&#039;s turnover remains below the threshold that triggers the tax audit obligation under section 44AB, because the foundational duty to obtain and furnish a tax audit report does not arise. On the facts, the turnover was found to be below the prescribed limit, so failure to furnish an audit report could not attract penalty. Non-compliance before the first appellate authority did not affect that merits-based conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>