<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 668 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443046</link>
    <description>The court determined that the revocation of the appellant&#039;s Custom Broker License by CESTAT was disproportionately excessive. It set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the doctrine of proportionality in administrative actions. The court directed that any future application for renewal or a new Custom Broker License by the appellant should be considered in accordance with the law. The appeal was disposed of on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 668 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443046</link>
      <description>The court determined that the revocation of the appellant&#039;s Custom Broker License by CESTAT was disproportionately excessive. It set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the doctrine of proportionality in administrative actions. The court directed that any future application for renewal or a new Custom Broker License by the appellant should be considered in accordance with the law. The appeal was disposed of on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>