<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 667 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443045</link>
    <description>The court quashed the impugned order dated 22.09.2020, which denied the petitioner duty drawback benefits due to a missing bank realization statement. The respondents failed to verify the statement uploaded by the bank on 02.09.2013. The court directed the respondents to issue a notice for a personal hearing, allowing the petitioner to submit the bank realization statement. A new order is to be passed within six weeks. The writ petition was allowed with no costs, and all connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 667 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443045</link>
      <description>The court quashed the impugned order dated 22.09.2020, which denied the petitioner duty drawback benefits due to a missing bank realization statement. The respondents failed to verify the statement uploaded by the bank on 02.09.2013. The court directed the respondents to issue a notice for a personal hearing, allowing the petitioner to submit the bank realization statement. A new order is to be passed within six weeks. The writ petition was allowed with no costs, and all connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>