<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33985</link>
    <description>The Court addressed Central Excise Appeals concerning pre-deposit requirements, penalties on Directors and Manager, and cash pre-deposits. It emphasized evidence for penalty imposition and undue hardship in pre-deposit orders. The Court modified the pre-deposit order, permitting appellants to provide alternative security within a specified timeframe, resolving the Appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 22 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33985</link>
      <description>The Court addressed Central Excise Appeals concerning pre-deposit requirements, penalties on Directors and Manager, and cash pre-deposits. It emphasized evidence for penalty imposition and undue hardship in pre-deposit orders. The Court modified the pre-deposit order, permitting appellants to provide alternative security within a specified timeframe, resolving the Appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>