<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 660 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443038</link>
    <description>Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply to arrests made under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, because arrest under PMLA is governed by the authorised officer&#039;s possession of material, recorded reasons to believe, and written reasons under the special statute. The Telangana High Court also indicated that remand refusal could not rest on an incomplete appraisal of the arrest material, and the Designated Court had to reconsider the matter in light of the statutory scheme and the material placed before it. The impugned order was set aside, with compensation and action-related claims deferred to fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 660 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443038</link>
      <description>Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not apply to arrests made under Section 19 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, because arrest under PMLA is governed by the authorised officer&#039;s possession of material, recorded reasons to believe, and written reasons under the special statute. The Telangana High Court also indicated that remand refusal could not rest on an incomplete appraisal of the arrest material, and the Designated Court had to reconsider the matter in light of the statutory scheme and the material placed before it. The impugned order was set aside, with compensation and action-related claims deferred to fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>