<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 654 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443032</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original confirming demands for Service Tax, interest, and penalties on liquidated damages recovered by the appellant for delays in supply or service contracts. Citing previous orders and a Circular, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Service Tax on liquidated damages was not applicable, granting consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 08:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 654 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443032</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original confirming demands for Service Tax, interest, and penalties on liquidated damages recovered by the appellant for delays in supply or service contracts. Citing previous orders and a Circular, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Service Tax on liquidated damages was not applicable, granting consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=443032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>