<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 126 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33981</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the expenses incurred for construction purposes were illegal and not allowable. The court confirmed the addition of undisclosed income for illegal expenses camouflaged as labor or construction expenses, citing the Explanation to section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the unaccounted portion of income was included in the block return due to discrepancies in claimed versus actual expenses found in seized materials. The court emphasized adherence to statutory provisions disallowing deductions for expenses related to offenses or prohibited purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 126 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33981</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision that the expenses incurred for construction purposes were illegal and not allowable. The court confirmed the addition of undisclosed income for illegal expenses camouflaged as labor or construction expenses, citing the Explanation to section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. Additionally, the unaccounted portion of income was included in the block return due to discrepancies in claimed versus actual expenses found in seized materials. The court emphasized adherence to statutory provisions disallowing deductions for expenses related to offenses or prohibited purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>