https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309655 The Court dismissed the revision challenging the order imposing payment as a condition for suspension of sentence. The Court upheld the lower appellate Court's decision, emphasizing the enforceability of the liability under the dishonored cheque despite the tripartite agreement. The Court found the revision against the interlocutory order not maintainable under Section 397 of the CrPC. Additionally, the Court supported the lower appellate Court's direction to deposit 20% of the amount as a condition precedent, citing precedent that such deposits are typically required. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309655 The Court dismissed the revision challenging the order imposing payment as a condition for suspension of sentence. The Court upheld the lower appellate Court's decision, emphasizing the enforceability of the liability under the dishonored cheque despite the tripartite agreement. The Court found the revision against the interlocutory order not maintainable under Section 397 of the CrPC. Additionally, the Court supported the lower appellate Court's direction to deposit 20% of the amount as a condition precedent, citing precedent that such deposits are typically required. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309655