<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2122 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309651</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC disposed of the petition, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate court, with the interim order to continue for six weeks due to the concerned HC being on vacation. The decision relied on a previous ruling in Aasma Mohammed Farooq &amp;amp; Anr. v. Union of India &amp;amp; Ors. (W.P.(C) 12494/2018).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2122 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309651</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC disposed of the petition, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate court, with the interim order to continue for six weeks due to the concerned HC being on vacation. The decision relied on a previous ruling in Aasma Mohammed Farooq &amp;amp; Anr. v. Union of India &amp;amp; Ors. (W.P.(C) 12494/2018).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>