<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2320 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309658</link>
    <description>The SC held that a contractual clause barring interest on earnest money, security deposits and amounts payable under the contract did not, without express wording, exclude pendente lite interest on sums quantified as damages in arbitration. Interest pendente lite compensates a claimant for being kept out of money found due during the lis, and an arbitrator may grant it unless the contract contains a clear and specific prohibition. A general restriction on interest for specified contractual payments cannot be extended to unascertained claims later assessed and awarded as damages. The clause therefore did not bar the award of pendente lite interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2320 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309658</link>
      <description>The SC held that a contractual clause barring interest on earnest money, security deposits and amounts payable under the contract did not, without express wording, exclude pendente lite interest on sums quantified as damages in arbitration. Interest pendente lite compensates a claimant for being kept out of money found due during the lis, and an arbitrator may grant it unless the contract contains a clear and specific prohibition. A general restriction on interest for specified contractual payments cannot be extended to unascertained claims later assessed and awarded as damages. The clause therefore did not bar the award of pendente lite interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>