https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309650 The court quashed the suspension order dated 14th December 2017 and subsequent orders dated 18th May 2018 and 15th June 2018, directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner. Emphasizing the need for periodic review of suspension and adherence to principles of natural justice, the court aligned with the Supreme Court's judgment in Ajay Kumar Choudhary v. UOI. The respondent was instructed to decide on the treatment of the suspension period and communicate the decision within six months. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309650 The court quashed the suspension order dated 14th December 2017 and subsequent orders dated 18th May 2018 and 15th June 2018, directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner. Emphasizing the need for periodic review of suspension and adherence to principles of natural justice, the court aligned with the Supreme Court's judgment in Ajay Kumar Choudhary v. UOI. The respondent was instructed to decide on the treatment of the suspension period and communicate the decision within six months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309650