https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309661 SC held that execution of a document is not admitted merely by admitting signatures, as this would unfairly burden parties denying execution and lead to registration of disputed documents. The Registrar exceeded jurisdiction by adjudicating fraud and undue influence claims under Section 74, as such substantive disputes require civil court determination. The court distinguished between signing and execution, noting circumstances where individuals may sign without understanding contents or sign blank papers later converted to different documents. The Registrar's direction to register the sale deed despite the appellant's denial of execution was contrary to law, as triable issues of fraud required proper civil adjudication rather than administrative determination. en-us Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309661 SC held that execution of a document is not admitted merely by admitting signatures, as this would unfairly burden parties denying execution and lead to registration of disputed documents. The Registrar exceeded jurisdiction by adjudicating fraud and undue influence claims under Section 74, as such substantive disputes require civil court determination. The court distinguished between signing and execution, noting circumstances where individuals may sign without understanding contents or sign blank papers later converted to different documents. The Registrar's direction to register the sale deed despite the appellant's denial of execution was contrary to law, as triable issues of fraud required proper civil adjudication rather than administrative determination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309661