https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309648 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the findings against the plaintiff and decreeing the suit in the plaintiff's favor. The court clarified the correct application of the Limitation Act, ruling that the plaintiff's claim for possession was upheld based on title, not the void sale deed, and rejecting the defendant's plea of adverse possession. The plaintiff was awarded the relief sought, emphasizing the 12-year limitation period under Article 65 of the Limitation Act for the suit. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309648 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the findings against the plaintiff and decreeing the suit in the plaintiff's favor. The court clarified the correct application of the Limitation Act, ruling that the plaintiff's claim for possession was upheld based on title, not the void sale deed, and rejecting the defendant's plea of adverse possession. The plaintiff was awarded the relief sought, emphasizing the 12-year limitation period under Article 65 of the Limitation Act for the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309648