<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1623 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309657</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed the Division Bench&#039;s direction to remit the award back to the Arbitral Tribunal, citing a jurisdictional error. The award was set aside due to lack of reasons, and parties were allowed to pursue remedies as per the law. The appeal was partially allowed, with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1623 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309657</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed the Division Bench&#039;s direction to remit the award back to the Arbitral Tribunal, citing a jurisdictional error. The award was set aside due to lack of reasons, and parties were allowed to pursue remedies as per the law. The appeal was partially allowed, with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>