<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2034 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309646</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI held that the appellants were eligible for the benefit of Notification 67/95-CE and had complied with the necessary provisions for exemption under Notification 67/1995. The Tribunal found that the impugned orders were not legally sustainable and set them aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief, if any. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the compliance by the appellants with the relevant rules and notifications, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants and dismissing the appeal by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2034 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309646</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI held that the appellants were eligible for the benefit of Notification 67/95-CE and had complied with the necessary provisions for exemption under Notification 67/1995. The Tribunal found that the impugned orders were not legally sustainable and set them aside, allowing the appeals with consequential relief, if any. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the compliance by the appellants with the relevant rules and notifications, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants and dismissing the appeal by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>