<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1991 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309652</link>
    <description>The court found the delay in completing assessments under the Tamilnadu General Sales Tax Act unacceptable, noting a significant time lapse between issuing pre-assessment notices and passing final orders. Emphasizing the importance of timely assessments, the court referred to statutory provisions mandating dealers to maintain records for a specified period. Regarding the interpretation of turnover under Section 2(r) of TNGST, the court ruled that consideration from the sale of rubber is excluded from turnover for sales tax purposes. As a result, the writ petitions challenging the assessments were allowed, and related petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1991 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309652</link>
      <description>The court found the delay in completing assessments under the Tamilnadu General Sales Tax Act unacceptable, noting a significant time lapse between issuing pre-assessment notices and passing final orders. Emphasizing the importance of timely assessments, the court referred to statutory provisions mandating dealers to maintain records for a specified period. Regarding the interpretation of turnover under Section 2(r) of TNGST, the court ruled that consideration from the sale of rubber is excluded from turnover for sales tax purposes. As a result, the writ petitions challenging the assessments were allowed, and related petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>