<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1387 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309649</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Finance Act, 1944, was disposed of in favor of the respondent-assessee. The Court found that the substantial questions of law raised in the appeal had already been settled in a previous decision in favor of the respondent. Consequently, all the issues were resolved in favor of the respondent-assessee and against the appellant-Revenue, affirming the decision in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 21:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1387 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309649</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal under the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the Finance Act, 1944, was disposed of in favor of the respondent-assessee. The Court found that the substantial questions of law raised in the appeal had already been settled in a previous decision in favor of the respondent. Consequently, all the issues were resolved in favor of the respondent-assessee and against the appellant-Revenue, affirming the decision in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>