https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309642 The court upheld the enforceability of the karar, finding consideration for the option of repurchase and ruling it binding on the family. It held that the option under the karar was assignable, enforceable against subsequent parties, and could be enforced against surviving co-parceners under Hindu Law. However, Second Appeal No. 843 was dismissed as the plaintiff lacked a valid interest due to the absence of a present right in the property. The court's decision was affirmed, except for Second Appeal No. 843, which was dismissed for lack of a valid hypothecation. en-us Fri, 18 Feb 1916 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:44:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309642 The court upheld the enforceability of the karar, finding consideration for the option of repurchase and ruling it binding on the family. It held that the option under the karar was assignable, enforceable against subsequent parties, and could be enforced against surviving co-parceners under Hindu Law. However, Second Appeal No. 843 was dismissed as the plaintiff lacked a valid interest due to the absence of a present right in the property. The court's decision was affirmed, except for Second Appeal No. 843, which was dismissed for lack of a valid hypothecation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Feb 1916 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309642