<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1373 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309640</link>
    <description>The court set aside the current arbitral tribunal due to intentional delays and non-compliance with court orders, appointing a sole Arbitrator to expedite the process. Justice U.P. Singh was appointed as the new Arbitrator, with directions for prompt engagement from both parties. The East Central Railway and its authorities were directed to bear the Arbitrator&#039;s remuneration and expenses, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s undue harassment during the prolonged dispute period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1373 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309640</link>
      <description>The court set aside the current arbitral tribunal due to intentional delays and non-compliance with court orders, appointing a sole Arbitrator to expedite the process. Justice U.P. Singh was appointed as the new Arbitrator, with directions for prompt engagement from both parties. The East Central Railway and its authorities were directed to bear the Arbitrator&#039;s remuneration and expenses, acknowledging the petitioner&#039;s undue harassment during the prolonged dispute period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>