<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1908 (5) TMI 1 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309638</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad allowed the appeal, set aside the lower court&#039;s decision based on limitation under Article 91 of the Limitation Act, and remanded the case for further consideration. The plaintiff sought a declaration that a sale deed was a sham transaction, not to set it aside, so Article 91 did not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1908 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1908 (5) TMI 1 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309638</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad allowed the appeal, set aside the lower court&#039;s decision based on limitation under Article 91 of the Limitation Act, and remanded the case for further consideration. The plaintiff sought a declaration that a sale deed was a sham transaction, not to set it aside, so Article 91 did not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1908 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>