https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309636 The High Court allowed the appeal, dismissing the suit due to lack of evidence of fraud supporting the lower court's finding. The deed was deemed void ab initio as it was executed under misrepresentation, making subsequent transactions void. The court held that the suit was not barred by limitation as the deed was void from the beginning. The parties were ordered to bear their own costs. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:43:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309636 The High Court allowed the appeal, dismissing the suit due to lack of evidence of fraud supporting the lower court's finding. The deed was deemed void ab initio as it was executed under misrepresentation, making subsequent transactions void. The court held that the suit was not barred by limitation as the deed was void from the beginning. The parties were ordered to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Dec 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309636