https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309633 A transfer made in wilful disobedience of an operative interim injunction is treated as a nullity and cannot confer lawful possession, especially where a co-sharer purports to sell a specific portion without partition by metes and bounds. In proceedings under Order XXXIX, Rule 2A CPC, attachment serves as a coercive measure to enforce compliance with the injunction, and the transferees' claimed portion need not be excluded when the alienation itself is void. The HC therefore held that the entire property in dispute could be attached to secure obedience to the injunction. en-us Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309633 A transfer made in wilful disobedience of an operative interim injunction is treated as a nullity and cannot confer lawful possession, especially where a co-sharer purports to sell a specific portion without partition by metes and bounds. In proceedings under Order XXXIX, Rule 2A CPC, attachment serves as a coercive measure to enforce compliance with the injunction, and the transferees' claimed portion need not be excluded when the alienation itself is void. The HC therefore held that the entire property in dispute could be attached to secure obedience to the injunction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309633