https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309630 A conviction for criminal breach of trust was upheld where the accused admitted receipt of the money, an extra-judicial confession indicated misappropriation, and the non-production of certain documents did not show any real bearing on the defence or create reasonable doubt. The absence of sanction for the related conspiracy charge did not vitiate the substantive conviction for breach of trust because the substantive offence was distinct and no prejudice was shown. The objection based on misjoinder of charges also failed, as no timely objection or actual embarrassment in defence was demonstrated. The substantive conviction therefore stood. en-us Wed, 05 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:32:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309630 A conviction for criminal breach of trust was upheld where the accused admitted receipt of the money, an extra-judicial confession indicated misappropriation, and the non-production of certain documents did not show any real bearing on the defence or create reasonable doubt. The absence of sanction for the related conspiracy charge did not vitiate the substantive conviction for breach of trust because the substantive offence was distinct and no prejudice was shown. The objection based on misjoinder of charges also failed, as no timely objection or actual embarrassment in defence was demonstrated. The substantive conviction therefore stood. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Apr 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309630