<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 619 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442997</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the revenue authority, overturning the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 45 crores addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The HC found the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation flawed, emphasizing the lack of inquiry into the investor companies&#039; financial status and questioning the transaction&#039;s genuineness and creditworthiness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 619 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442997</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the revenue authority, overturning the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the Rs. 45 crores addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The HC found the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation flawed, emphasizing the lack of inquiry into the investor companies&#039; financial status and questioning the transaction&#039;s genuineness and creditworthiness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>