<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 613 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the reopening of assessment and deletion of additions made by the AO. The Tribunal found that the primary issue of understated purchases was reconciled, and the estimation of income at 4% lacked justification without comparable cases. Consequently, the assessment proceedings were annulled, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed on both grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2023 09:02:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=726002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 613 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the reopening of assessment and deletion of additions made by the AO. The Tribunal found that the primary issue of understated purchases was reconciled, and the estimation of income at 4% lacked justification without comparable cases. Consequently, the assessment proceedings were annulled, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed on both grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>