<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442985</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, finding that the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the relevant details during reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal held that the assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was unwarranted as the AO had considered the issues. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the PCIT&#039;s order was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 607 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442985</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263, finding that the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the relevant details during reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal held that the assumption of jurisdiction under section 263 was unwarranted as the AO had considered the issues. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the PCIT&#039;s order was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>